🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters applauding your insights on growing your business? Do recruiters reaching out to explore collaborations?

If not, the reason could be your gender.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous women joined a collective professional network test this week following popular discussions indicated that switching their gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" language - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who use professional networking terminology.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which posts are shown to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your posts shows up in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her audience decline substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with similar "assertive" style

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my posts were more personal - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after one week, saying "Each day I continued, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some testers experienced favorable outcomes. One writer who changed both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These experiments occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where identical posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and spread posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."