🔗 Share this article

When I am a Dungeon Master, I traditionally steered clear of heavy use of randomization during my tabletop roleplaying games. I preferred was for story direction and session development to be shaped by deliberate decisions as opposed to the roll of a die. Recently, I decided to try something different, and I'm very pleased with the outcome.

The Catalyst: Seeing a Custom Mechanic

An influential streamed game features a DM who often calls for "fate rolls" from the adventurers. The process entails selecting a polyhedral and outlining consequences contingent on the roll. It's at its core no distinct from rolling on a random table, these get invented spontaneously when a character's decision lacks a obvious resolution.

I decided to try this approach at my own game, mainly because it appeared novel and offered a break from my standard routine. The results were eye-opening, prompting me to reconsider the often-debated dynamic between pre-determination and randomization in a D&D campaign.

A Powerful In-Game Example

At a session, my group had concluded a massive conflict. Later, a player asked about two key NPCs—a pair—had survived. In place of picking a fate, I asked for a roll. I instructed the player to roll a d20. The possible results were: a low roll, both were killed; a middling roll, only one succumbed; a high roll, they made it.

Fate decreed a 4. This led to a incredibly emotional sequence where the party discovered the corpses of their companions, still united in death. The cleric performed a ceremony, which was particularly powerful due to prior roleplaying. As a final gesture, I improvised that the remains were miraculously transformed, showing a magical Prayer Bead. I rolled for, the bead's magical effect was perfectly what the group lacked to address another pressing story problem. It's impossible to script this type of serendipitous coincidences.

Sharpening On-the-Spot Skills

This incident made me wonder if randomization and thinking on your feet are truly the essence of D&D. Even if you are a prep-heavy DM, your skill to pivot may atrophy. Groups reliably find joy in derailing the most detailed plans. Therefore, a skilled DM has to be able to adapt swiftly and create content on the fly.

Employing similar mechanics is a fantastic way to train these abilities without venturing too far outside your preparation. The key is to apply them for minor situations that won't drastically alter the session's primary direction. For instance, I would avoid using it to determine if the main villain is a secret enemy. Instead, I would consider using it to determine whether the characters enter a room just in time to see a major incident unfolds.

Enhancing Player Agency

Spontaneous randomization also works to make players feel invested and create the feeling that the story is responsive, evolving based on their actions in real-time. It prevents the perception that they are merely pawns in a rigidly planned narrative, thereby enhancing the shared nature of storytelling.

This philosophy has historically been part of the original design. Original D&D were enamored with encounter generators, which made sense for a playstyle focused on dungeon crawling. Although contemporary D&D often prioritizes narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they need exhaustive notes, that may not be the best approach.

Striking the Sweet Spot

It is perfectly no issue with doing your prep. But, there is also no problem with letting go and allowing the dice to guide minor details in place of you. Direction is a significant factor in a DM's responsibilities. We need it to facilitate play, yet we often struggle to cede it, in situations where doing so could be beneficial.

The core suggestion is this: Don't be afraid of relinquishing a bit of your plan. Experiment with a little randomness for minor outcomes. You might just discover that the organic story beat is significantly more powerful than anything you could have planned by yourself.